205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.77%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 1.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.54%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 1.23%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.59%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 1.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.97%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.21% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.65%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.86%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.41%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.24%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.64%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.18%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 1.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.44%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-29.30%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 0.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.43%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 2.72% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.72%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.