205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 4.78%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.46%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 6.60%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 3.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 4.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.41%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 2.82%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
2.78%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 0.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.33%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 212.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.98%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 323.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 6.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.02%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.79%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 6.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 10.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.94%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.