205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.23%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 7.01%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.00%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 6.58%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.51%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.74%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.28% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.84%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1030.77%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.67%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.88%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 3.23%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
150.00%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.52%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 17.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.72%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.06%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 18.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 10.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-950.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.19%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 15.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 8.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.47%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-10.57%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 16.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.77%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.77%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 14.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.93%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 15.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.04%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.95%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.