205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
8.71%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 6.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.20%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.00%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.90%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 729.13%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-55.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.07%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 108.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.31% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.