PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.65%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 5.89%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.02%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 8.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.39%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 3.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.68%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.54%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.68%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.53%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 6.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.83%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 7.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.00%
Interest expense change of 5.00% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.18%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.08%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.47%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.19%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.64%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 274.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
46.35%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
43.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-54.62%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
75.78%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
72.93%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.95%
EPS change of 78.95% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
76.32%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.88%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.