205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-2.25%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
14.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.19%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.16%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 3.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-294.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-32.18%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 2.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.02%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 3.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.35%
Interest expense change of 4.35% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-12.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
70.42%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.36%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.37%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.17%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.29%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 454.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
135.83%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
123.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1750.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 594.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
82.32%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.63%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.37%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
81.25%
Diluted EPS change of 81.25% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.