205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
13.31%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.43%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.40%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.10%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.10%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-5.05%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.48%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.77%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.