PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.66%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.26%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.24%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.25% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.98%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.14%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 6.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.46%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.83%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-6.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
82.14%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 160.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-16.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.56%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.91%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.