205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.01%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 4.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.96%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.78%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.17%
Interest expense change of 4.17% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.80%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.95%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-280.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.60%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.70%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 6.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 12.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.