205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.10%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.00%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.17%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.07%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 1.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.25%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 13770.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.36%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.94%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.33%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.06%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.58%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.17%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.25%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.63%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.81%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 181.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.66%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.07%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.92%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.40%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.52%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.