205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.81%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.26%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 113.11%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.81%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.92%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.90%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 5.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.67%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.02%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.83%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 56.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.55%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.02%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.79%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.74%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.39%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.05%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.00%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.41%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.19%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.71%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.32%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.