PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.28%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.84%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.83%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 887.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 931.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.52%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.84%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.29%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.28%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 1025.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.85%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 102.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.74%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 91.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.89%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 84.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 94.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 85.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.61%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 84.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.27%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 132.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.19%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.26%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 82.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.46%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.05%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.