205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.45%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 7.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 17.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.83%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.56%
Interest expense change of 5.56% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 82.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 190.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.45%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 103.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 103.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1371.43%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 102.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
8.40%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 105.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.69%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 106.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.97%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.16%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 106.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.43%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 107.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 108.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 108.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.51%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.30% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.74%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.