205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.45%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.47%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.69%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.88%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 8.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 4.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.79%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.20%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.45%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 53.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.38%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 55.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 109.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.40%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 100.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-83.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
20.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 93.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 84.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 386.62%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
21.69%
Net income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 41.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 35.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.86%
EPS growth 50-75% of MRVL's 40.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
22.33%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of MRVL's 40.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.60%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.