205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 1.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.93%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 2.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 19.01%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense change of 10.53% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1400.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 478.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 333.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-73.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.