205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
4.17%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 3.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
7.03%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.95%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.89%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.86%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.43%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of MRVL's 56.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
1.75%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 23.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.89%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 19.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.59%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 25.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.32%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 20.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-220.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 803.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 28.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.62%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 23.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
60.96%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.86%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 55.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.98%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 48.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.62%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 57.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 52.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.61%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.