205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.09%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 1.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.16%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.56%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 8.78%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.94%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.77%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 10.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.29%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 5.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.84%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.96%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 21.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.42%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 48.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.92%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.