205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 10.04%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.88%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 25.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.38%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.27%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.26%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 22.38%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.17%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 40.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.39%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 33.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.79%
Interest expense growth less than half of MRVL's 6373.36%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.49%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 159.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.88%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.95%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.63%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.23%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.07%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.98%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 11.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 10.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.