205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.81%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 27.92%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.30%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 62.20%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.64%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.81%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.82%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 22.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.55%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.35%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 7.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.93%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 32.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.27%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 41.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.00%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 123.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 111.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.16%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 19.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.51%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.63%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-212.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.36%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.51%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.84%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 131.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.20%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.14%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 19.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 16.97% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.