PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.16%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.43%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-14.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.71%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 266.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.05%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.65%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
188.89%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 42.96%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-20.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.65%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 1956.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-24.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.83%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.