205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
17.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 5.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.82%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.08%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 131.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.17%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 1.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.08%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
0.40%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 8.43%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.67%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.55%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.19%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-143.14%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 49.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
331.68%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 114.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.03%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.