205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.23%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.34%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.71%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 7.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.46%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 10.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.52%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.84%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.82%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 3.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.36%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.95%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 16.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.64%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 13.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.62%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.18%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 100.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.85%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.83%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.32%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.