205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.78%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
0.74%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.01%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 9.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
3.02%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MRVL's 4.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.30%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.13%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.70%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.72%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.35%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.49%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.79%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 35.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.13%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.88%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.63%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.28%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.20%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.15%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.16%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.63%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.