205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.26%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.27%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.48%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 70.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.32%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.88%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 28.29%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 28.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.28%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 47.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.77%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.15%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 90.01%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
6.38%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.24%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.51%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 24.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.14%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.09%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.20%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 18.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 18.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.