205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.89%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 10.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.52%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.65%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 16.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.22%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 5.32% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 7.36%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.66%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 119.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.98%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 5.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.69%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 5.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.21%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.38%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 5.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.25%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 28.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.01%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 13.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 203.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.81%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 193.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-18.47%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 103.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 102.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.53%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 18.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.51%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 109.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.06%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 108.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.94%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 113.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.77%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 113.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.77%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.76%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 4.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.