205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.47%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.93%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
1.64%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 4.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.84%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
30.88%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.76%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
4.18%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 6.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.96%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 79.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.46%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 71.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
150.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.88%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.65%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.82%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 102.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.56%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 102.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.53%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 102.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 102.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.