205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.86%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 2.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.82%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.91%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 8.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 5.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.64%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 3.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.37%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.42%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.