205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.87%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 7.23%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.54%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.09%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.18%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 2000.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.04%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.38%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.93%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.09%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
5.25%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.29%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 58.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.17%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 30.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.99%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.65%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.