205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.47%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 0.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.95%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.47%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 20.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.11%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 19.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.85%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.27%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.76%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 5.32%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.81%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 57.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.50%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 66.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.39%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 94.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.21%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 94.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.55%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 53.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 53.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.79%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 1416.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.56%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.