205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.53%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MU's 8.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.23%
Cost growth of 8.23% while MU maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-4.88%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 20.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.86%
Margin decline while MU shows 10.70% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.99%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 12.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-133.33%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 61.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 48.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.79%
Operating income decline while MU shows 205.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.96%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 197.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-133.33%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.71%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 122.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-163.64%
Net income decline while MU shows 125.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.30%
Net margin decline while MU shows 107.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
EPS decline while MU shows 354.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-220.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 354.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.