205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 42.39%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
13.34%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 34.07%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 49.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.08%
Margin decline while MU shows 4.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 9.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-351.72%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 23.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 60.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 12.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 110.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 47.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-32004.55%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 42.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 113.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 49.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 112.65%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.90%
Net income decline while MU shows 113.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.08%
Net margin decline while MU shows 49.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.50%
EPS decline while MU shows 112.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 112.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.38%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
16.37%
Diluted share change of 16.37% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.