205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.08%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MU's 15.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
9.61%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 2.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.16%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 27.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.63%
Margin decline while MU shows 10.63% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1883.76%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 6.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-347.83%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 3.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-418.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2788.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 21.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2572.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2800.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 34.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2583.50%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 16.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-81510.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.71%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 35.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 17.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 36.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 35.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.48%
Net margin decline while MU shows 17.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while MU shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 2.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.