PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 21.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.10%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 33.53%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.19%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 11.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.79%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 16.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 72.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 41.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 13.59%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.53%
EBITDA change of 12.53% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Similar operating income growth to MU's 7.81%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.52%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 460.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 17.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of MU's 13.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.96%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 20.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 18.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 18.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 1.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.84%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.