205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 35.05%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.72%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 34.24%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.44%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 35.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.06%
Margin decline while MU shows 0.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while MU shows 16.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.89%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 23.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-416.67%
D&A reduction while MU shows 20.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.30%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 48.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.63%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 20.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.41%
Operating income decline while MU shows 39.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.03%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 3.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
450.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.23%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 27.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.11%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 27.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 27.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
EPS decline while MU shows 27.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 27.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.57%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.