205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
6.96%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.96%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses change of 188.89% while MU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.37%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
187.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 78.64%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.82%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.33%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.86%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.55%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.