205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.34%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 46.60%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.20%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.44%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 271.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Margin decline while MU shows 153.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.99%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 4.92%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.44%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 16.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.73%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.49%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 242.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 131.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 6848.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 4703.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.03%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 2778.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.48%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 1927.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
57.46%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 2582.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.68%
Net income decline while MU shows 2050.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.78%
Net margin decline while MU shows 1430.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
EPS decline while MU shows 2051.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 1929.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.29%
Share count reduction while MU shows 1.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.04%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 11.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.