205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.97%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.65%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 12.46%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.03%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.03%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.25%
R&D reduction while MU shows 12.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
1.78%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.62%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 8.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-981.45%
D&A reduction while MU shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-280.40%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-275.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.45%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1139.25%
Other expenses change of 1139.25% while MU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
198.18%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
189.58%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
217.06%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
207.84%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
198.96%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
204.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.94%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.32%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.