205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 28.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.63%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 23.85%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.67%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 36.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.23%
Margin decline while MU shows 6.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
33.25%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 11.90%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.69%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 21.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 5.45%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 34.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while MU shows 60.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 25.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 463.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.31%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 69.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 31.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 72.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Net income decline while MU shows 70.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.86%
Net margin decline while MU shows 32.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.68%
EPS decline while MU shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.22%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 65.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.47%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 7.20% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.