205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.30%
Revenue decline while MU shows 43.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.38%
Cost reduction while MU shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 106.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 43.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.26%
R&D reduction while MU shows 30.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.60%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 13.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.97%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.50%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 4.86%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1060.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 96.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1103.17%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 44.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 168.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.27%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 86.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-53.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.57%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 162.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 82.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.62%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 151.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.77%
Net income decline while MU shows 164.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.58%
Net margin decline while MU shows 84.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.56%
EPS decline while MU shows 156.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.63%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 147.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.73%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 7.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
17.08%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 7.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.