205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.26%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-29.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.13%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 5.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
247.08%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 2.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
88.10%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.00%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-62.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.59%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 220.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-63.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.10%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-63.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.06%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.19%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.