205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.98%
Revenue decline while MU shows 6.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
3.29%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 9.29%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-10.41%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 1.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.04%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 9.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.16%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.93%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 5.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
Similar D&A growth to MU's 3.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-15.32%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 6.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.33%
Operating income decline while MU shows 14.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.07%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 7.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
44.83%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 14.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-20.56%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 15.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.12%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 8.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.68%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 98.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.97%
Net income decline while MU shows 2.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while MU shows 8.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.