205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Revenue decline while MU shows 5.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.06%
Cost reduction while MU shows 5.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 7.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.43%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 2.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
D&A reduction while MU shows 1.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of MU's 7.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 39.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.94%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 31.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.40%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 39.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 31.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.23%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.12%
Net income decline while MU shows 65.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.01%
Net margin decline while MU shows 56.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.24%
EPS decline while MU shows 84.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 76.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.