205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.18%
Revenue decline while MU shows 8.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.50%
Cost reduction while MU shows 7.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.63%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 10.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.83%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.60%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 9.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 5.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-5.97%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 7.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.71%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.09%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.36%
Operating income decline while MU shows 34.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.50%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 24.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 112.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.81%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 45.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 34.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.76%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-10.69%
Net income decline while MU shows 45.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.78%
Net margin decline while MU shows 34.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.76%
EPS decline while MU shows 50.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 35.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.18%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 8.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.