205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.73%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 7.13%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.18%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.31%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 40.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.41%
Margin decline while MU shows 31.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.34%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 4.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 488.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.17%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 21.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
D&A reduction while MU shows 17.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.14%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.80%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 40.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.21%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 117.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-70.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.03%
Share count reduction while MU shows 7.12% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.