205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.30%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.53%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.98%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.56%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.18%
R&D reduction while MU shows 32.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 17.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.14%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 2.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.03%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 10.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
13.59%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.97%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.87%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.59%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.31%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.12%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.65%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.22%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.17%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.