205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 10.23%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 3.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.06%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 211.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.06%
Margin decline while MU shows 201.27% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.89%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.88%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 219.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 41.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while MU shows 70.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 73.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 333.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.06%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 70.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 72.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.34%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 425.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Net income decline while MU shows 69.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Net margin decline while MU shows 72.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.44%
EPS decline while MU shows 69.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.27%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 69.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.21%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.