205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.79%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.14%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
39.45%
Similar gross profit growth to MU's 40.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
18.40%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x MU's 16.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 16.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.83%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
86.20%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 0.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
58.08%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 192.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3330.00%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2812.08%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2273.33%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1914.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4900.00%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1429.41%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1198.47%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2000.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.