205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.75%
Revenue decline while MU shows 8.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.70%
Cost reduction while MU shows 18.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.00%
R&D reduction while MU shows 38.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3650.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 168.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-21.18%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 12.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.67%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 17.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.25%
Similar D&A growth to MU's 6.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
0.55%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.68%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.36%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.05%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.62%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 160.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.66%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.35%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.27%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.45%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.01%
Share count reduction while MU shows 29.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 8.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.