205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.23%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.00%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.51%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 9.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.74%
Margin decline while MU shows 15.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.84%
R&D reduction while MU shows 13.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1030.77%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.67%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.88%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.00%
Interest expense change of 150.00% while MU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.52%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 19.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.06%
Operating income decline while MU shows 32.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 39.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-950.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 42.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.19%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 42.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 50.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.47%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 197.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.57%
Net income decline while MU shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.77%
Net margin decline while MU shows 9.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.77%
EPS decline while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.93%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.04%
Share count reduction while MU shows 1.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.95%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.