PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Revenue decline while MU shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.71%
Similar cost growth to MU's 9.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-11.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses change of 80.27% while MU maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 51.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
15.20%
Similar total costs growth to MU's 14.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
40.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MU's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
46.90%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.46%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-31.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.42%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 126.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-50.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.